DMARC: start at none, read the reports, then tighten
DMARC tells receivers what to do when a message fails authentication. Publishing reject before you know who sends as you is how legitimate mail disappears.
A hard bounce is a permanent answer and must be suppressed immediately. Retrying it damages the reputation that gets the rest of your mail delivered.
An email bounce is a delivery failure returned by the receiving server. The distinction that governs every decision afterwards is between a hard bounce — a permanent failure such as an address that does not exist — and a soft bounce, a temporary condition such as a full mailbox or a server that is briefly unavailable.
Hard bounces must be suppressed at once and never retried. Continuing to send to addresses that do not exist is one of the clearest signals that a sender is not maintaining its list, and receivers use exactly that signal when deciding where the rest of your mail goes.
The last case is the one that misleads teams: a clean bounce rate does not mean mail is arriving. Acceptance means the server took the message, not that it reached an inbox.
Where a bounce rate above a few percent appears on a list that used to be clean, the cause is usually an imported list, a long gap since the last send, or an authentication change that receivers are now enforcing. Sending more, or sending faster, resolves none of these. Rising bounces are an email deliverability signal, not only a list problem.
Most hard bounces are preventable: confirm the address at the point of capture, use double opt-in for marketing lists, re-verify lists that have not been mailed for months, and never buy a list — the bounces alone will damage the domain, quite apart from the legal position under privacy law.
Authentication matters here too. Mail that fails SPF or DKIM alignment is more likely to be rejected outright, and those rejections arrive as bounces that look like recipient problems but are yours. Checking the DMARC reports when bounces rise usually explains more than reading the bounce text.
Ettex Mail keeps the delivery result against each message, so a bounce is a state of the record with its code retained rather than a notification somebody deleted. Suppression is the part that has to be honoured everywhere the address appears — and no tool substitutes for the discipline of not sending to people who never asked.
Below one to two percent for a maintained list. Anything higher points to list quality or authentication rather than to the recipients.
No. A hard bounce is a permanent answer; retrying it signals poor list hygiene and harms delivery of everything else you send.
People leave organisations and mailboxes are closed. Lists decay by a meaningful percentage every year, which is why re-verification before a large send is worthwhile.
No. A bounce is a rejection you are told about. Spam filtering usually happens after acceptance and is invisible in bounce statistics.
DMARC tells receivers what to do when a message fails authentication. Publishing reject before you know who sends as you is how legitimate mail disappears.
Segmentation is only worth doing if the segments get treated differently. Most segmentation projects produce a chart, and every customer continues to receive exactly the same email.
A marketing list is not the same asset as a customer database. It is governed by what people agreed to, and the difference shows up the first time somebody asks why they are receiving your email.