UTM parameters: labelling links so the numbers add up
UTM parameters tell your analytics where a visitor came from. The five fields, a naming convention that survives contact with colleagues, and the mistakes that split one campaign into nine.
Keyword research tells you which questions are worth answering. How to judge intent and competition, why volume is the least useful number, and where the winnable terms hide.
Keyword research is the work of finding out what people type when they have the problem you solve. It is less about discovering clever terms than about accepting plain ones: the phrases that bring customers are usually duller and more specific than anything a marketing session produces, and they are written in the customer's vocabulary rather than yours.
Because it is an average across a year, rounded into bands, and shared with everybody chasing the same list. A term with a thousand searches a month where the first page is occupied by large competitors returns nothing; a term with forty searches where somebody is describing their exact problem can bring a customer a week. Small companies win on specificity, which means deliberately choosing lower-volume phrases that match what you do precisely — and the tooling pushes the opposite way, because big numbers look like opportunity.
Look at the results page before judging any term. If the first page is dominated by comparison sites and marketplaces, the search engine has decided what kind of page belongs there, and an ordinary article will not displace it regardless of quality. That single check saves more wasted writing than any metric.
One intent per page, and a page that answers the question completely rather than ten pages circling it. The commonest failure after good research is splitting a topic across several thin pages targeting near-identical phrases, which makes them compete with each other and ranks none of them. Group the variants that mean the same thing, write one page that would satisfy somebody asking any of them, and move on to the next genuinely different question.
Ettex Web keeps the page and the thing it was written to answer together, which makes the later check possible: did this page bring anybody, and for what. Whether it did belongs with the conversion tracking rather than with rankings, since a page that ranks and converts nobody is still the wrong page.
Look at the actual results page. If it is filled with large sites, marketplaces or comparison pages, the format is decided and an ordinary article will not displace it.
Least of the factors. It is an annual average in bands, and a specific low-volume phrase that matches exactly what you sell is usually worth more than a broad popular one.
No. Group variants meaning the same thing into one page per intent, or the pages compete with each other and none of them ranks.
UTM parameters tell your analytics where a visitor came from. The five fields, a naming convention that survives contact with colleagues, and the mistakes that split one campaign into nine.
A cookie policy lists what you set, why, and how long it lasts. What has to be in it, why the banner is the real compliance question, and the common mistakes.
A modern slavery statement is public, annual and signed by the board. What has to be in it, where it goes, and the sentences that make it worse than saying nothing.