Standby letter of credit: the SBLC is a guarantee, not a payment method
A standby letter of credit is drawn only when something has gone wrong. That single difference changes how it is drafted, priced and diarised.
A loan note is issued under an instrument, held by noteholders and recorded in a register. Treating it as a longer promissory note is where the problems start.
A loan note is a debt instrument issued by a company: the company creates notes under a loan note instrument, subscribers pay for them, and each holder ends up with a certificate and an entry in the register of noteholders. It is a security, not a private IOU, and that distinction drives everything about how it is documented.
The confusion with a promissory note is common and worth clearing up early. A promissory note runs between two named parties. A loan note is created by a single document executed by the issuer, can be held by many people, and is normally transferable — which is why it turns up in acquisition consideration, in bridge financing and in crowdfunded lending.
Because the instrument binds every holder, including people who buy notes later and never negotiated anything, its terms have to stand on their own. There is no side correspondence to fall back on: a holder who bought a note on the strength of the instrument is entitled to read it as it stands.
Title to a loan note passes by entry in the register, not by handing over the certificate. A register that has not been updated after a transfer means the company is paying interest to the wrong person and the actual holder cannot enforce. This is the same category of failure as an out-of-date statutory book — invisible until a transaction requires it, and expensive at exactly that moment.
Keep the executed instrument, the certificates issued and the register in one place, with the version history intact. In a sale process the buyer’s counsel will reconcile all three, and any gap between them becomes a disclosure item or a price adjustment.
Drafting a loan note instrument is a document-control problem as much as a legal one: one instrument, many certificates, a register that has to track them, and amendments that must be applied to the version everyone actually holds. Ettex Docs keeps the instrument, its schedules and the amendment history in one versioned place, so the document circulated to noteholders is the document the company is bound by.
Two terms cause most later disputes. Conversion — the right or obligation to turn notes into shares — has to specify the trigger, the price or discount, and what happens if the round is smaller than expected. Subordination has to say what is subordinated to what, whether payment is blocked entirely or only on default, and who can waive it.
Both are cheap to write carefully at issue and expensive to argue about later, usually at the moment the company can least afford the delay.
They are the same species — a transferable debt instrument. In practice "bond" implies a larger, often listed issue with a trustee; "loan note" implies a private issue documented by an instrument.
Only if the instrument says so and security has actually been granted and registered. Many are unsecured, and some are expressly subordinated to a bank facility.
The issuing company, usually the company secretary. Entries record the holder, the amount held, the date of issue and any transfers.
Only as the instrument permits — typically with the consent of a stated majority of holders, and sometimes only with unanimity for terms touching principal, interest or maturity.
A standby letter of credit is drawn only when something has gone wrong. That single difference changes how it is drafted, priced and diarised.
Freezing changes moves risk rather than removing it. Everything queued during the freeze ships together afterwards, which is the riskiest release of the year.
A runbook that assumes context has none when it is needed. The reader is tired, unfamiliar with the system, and under time pressure — write for that reader.