Local SEO: being found by people who are nearby and ready
Local SEO is unusually tractable. Three things carry most of the result — a complete business listing, consistent details everywhere, and reviews — and none of them require a specialist.
Most SEO checklists are two hundred items long and sorted by category, which guarantees the important ones are buried. This one is sorted by what actually changes the result.
An SEO checklist is useful only if it is ordered by impact. The long ones circulating online are sorted by category — technical, on-page, off-page — which puts a hreflang audit next to having a title tag, and leaves a small site owner working through items that will not move anything. What follows is ordered by what tends to matter, most first.
The uncomfortable premise underneath all of it: if the page does not deserve to rank, no checklist will make it. Search engines are increasingly good at recognising a page that answers a question properly, and the technical items are permission to compete rather than a reason to win.
Meta descriptions do not affect ranking and are still worth writing, because they affect whether anyone clicks. That distinction — between what changes position and what changes clicks — is missing from most checklists, which is why people spend an afternoon on descriptions and none on page speed.
Keyword density, exact-match domains, submitting your site to search engines manually, meta keywords, and anything sold as a guaranteed ranking. Also worth resisting: rewriting a page every fortnight because a tool gave it a score of sixty-eight. Those scores measure conformance to a tool's model, not whether a person got their answer.
Ettex Sites gives you the pieces this list needs — editable titles, heading structure, stable URLs with redirects, structured data and pages that stay fast — and the choosing-a-tool question is covered in website builder. The geography-specific half of search is a different exercise, in local seo, and what to do once people arrive is in conversion rate optimization.
Being clear: we are not an SEO tool. There is no rank tracking, no keyword research, no backlink analysis and no site audit that assigns you a score. Those are separate products and some are genuinely useful; what a site builder can honestly offer is that the fundamentals above are editable rather than locked away.
That the page answers a real question better than the alternatives. Technical items are permission to compete; they do not make a thin page rank.
No, but they affect click-through from the results page, which is worth the five minutes. Confusing the two is why people optimise descriptions and ignore page speed.
As long as the question requires. Length correlates with covering a subject properly, which is why the correlation exists — padding a short answer to reach a word count helps nothing.
No. Links from places that would plausibly mention you anyway hold their value; purchased ones carry risk and a short half-life, and the money is better spent on something worth linking to.
Local SEO is unusually tractable. Three things carry most of the result — a complete business listing, consistent details everywhere, and reviews — and none of them require a specialist.
The question is not which is better. It is which parts of a small business site actually need a designer — and for most, that turns out to be a smaller list than the quotes suggest.
Every website builder demos beautifully. What separates them shows up later — when you need a page type nobody anticipated, when the site gets slow, and when you want your content out.