A skills gap analysis compares the skills a team needs with the skills it has. How to run one without it becoming a survey nobody trusts, and how to turn the result into training, hiring or redesigned roles.
A skills gap analysis compares the skills a team needs to deliver its work with the skills it actually has, then quantifies the difference. It is the step most training plans skip: courses get chosen because they are available or fashionable, rather than because a specific gap was measured. A good skills gap analysis produces a short list of gaps that matter, each with a decision attached — train, hire, contract, redeploy or stop doing the work.
The biggest risk is that people inflate or deflate their own levels. Two things help: separate the skills assessment from performance reviews and pay, and require evidence for the highest level rather than asking for a self-rating alone. Assess the skill, not the person — the question is whether the team can do the work, not who is good and who is bad. Expect a spread of levels; a team where everyone claims expert has told you nothing.
Pay particular attention to skills held by exactly one person. A single point of failure is a bigger operational risk than a skill nobody has, because the work is already depending on it.
Ettex Sheets is enough to run this: a matrix of roles and skills with required and actual levels, a gap column that calculates itself, and a filter for single points of failure. The output feeds the training plan, the hiring plan and internal mobility decisions — and because it is a sheet rather than a survey tool, updating it each quarter takes an hour rather than a project.
A competency matrix records who can do what today. A skills gap analysis compares that picture with what is required, so it adds the demand side and produces gaps and actions.
Annually for the whole organisation, and whenever a team takes on significantly different work — a new product, technology or regulatory requirement.
A combination: the employee self-assesses, the manager validates, and evidence such as certifications or delivered work supports the top level. Manager-only assessment misses hidden skills; self-assessment alone drifts.
Salary bands set the minimum, midpoint and maximum pay for each level of role. How to build salary bands from market data, how wide to make them, and how to handle people who fall outside their band.
A compensation review decides salary increases, promotions and bonuses in one cycle. How to set the budget, give managers guidelines they can apply, check for pay equity, and communicate the outcome.
Workforce planning compares the skills and headcount a business will need with what it has, then closes the gap on purpose. A practical process, the numbers to use, and the mistakes that turn it into a spreadsheet nobody trusts.