Memorandum of understanding: agreeing to work together before agreeing terms
A memorandum of understanding records shared intent between organisations. What it should say, which parts bind you anyway, and when to write a contract instead.
A health and safety policy has a statement of intent, an organisation section and the arrangements. The last one is where it becomes real, and where most are thin.
A health and safety policy — an occupational health and safety policy, an HSE policy, an OHS policy, depending on where you are and who is writing — is the document that says what you intend to do about safety, who is responsible for what, and how it will actually happen. In most jurisdictions it becomes a written legal requirement once you pass a small headcount threshold. Nearly every one you will read is strong on the first part, adequate on the second, and vague on the third, which is unfortunate because the third part is the one an inspector reads.
Keep the statement short and the arrangements long. The instinct is the reverse — a page of commitment and a paragraph of practice — because the commitment is easy to write. An inspector visiting after an accident will spend thirty seconds on the statement and the rest of the visit on whether the arrangements describe what you do.
Ettex Docs keeps the policy with version history and the review date visible, which matters more here than in most documents because the question asked later is always "which version was in force in March". Keep the arrangements as links to the live assessments rather than as restated summaries that drift out of step. It belongs beside the rest of your written rules — the same set as your hr policies examples and the employee handbook, even though safety sits under a different legal regime. Ettex does not write safety policies, does not assess competence, and the headcount threshold and content requirements differ by country.
For a small office, a few pages. For a construction firm, considerably more. Length should follow the hazards, and a twenty-page policy for a five-person consultancy signals a template rather than diligence.
The written requirement usually starts around five employees, but the duty to manage safety applies from the first. Below the threshold you still need risk assessments; writing the policy anyway costs an afternoon and answers a question customers increasingly ask.
The most senior person — owner, chief executive, managing director. The signature is the point: it establishes that safety accountability sits at the top rather than with whoever was given the file.
A memorandum of understanding records shared intent between organisations. What it should say, which parts bind you anyway, and when to write a contract instead.
An anti bribery policy is judged on what the company does, not what the document says. The clauses that matter, the registers behind them, and the grey areas.
Most RFP responses are lost to logistics, not prose. How to split the questions, hold the deadline and stop rewriting the same answer every quarter.