Employee referral: the cheapest hiring channel and its blind spot
Employee referrals hire faster and cheaper than any advert. How to run a scheme, what to pay and when, and the homogeneity problem that comes with it.
Required fields decide whether a form is completed honestly or at all. Which ones to enforce, what the cost of each is, and why mandatory fields produce invented data.
Every required field on a form is a small toll. Some are worth charging — without an email address you cannot reply — and most are charged out of hope rather than need. The cost is not only abandonment: a field somebody cannot answer honestly gets answered dishonestly, and invented data is worse than a blank, because a blank is visibly missing and an invention is not.
Three things, in increasing order of damage. Some people abandon the form, which you can measure. Some complete it with whatever passes validation, which you cannot — "N/A", a zero, the first option in the list. And some answer approximately when the field demanded precision, which produces data that looks clean and is quietly wrong. The third is the one that corrupts reporting, and it is caused almost entirely by asking for precision at a moment when the person does not have it.
Count how many fields are required, then halve it as an exercise and see which removals you actually regret. Most forms survive the halving, and the ones that do not identify the fields that genuinely mattered.
Fields accumulate. Each one was added for a reason, usually by somebody who needed it once, and almost nothing is ever removed because removal feels like losing data. Look at completion rates per field annually: anything with a high rate of identical values is being filled in to get past it, and anything optional with a near-zero completion rate can go.
Ettex Forms makes the distinction visible — required, optional and derived — so a form can be audited by looking at it rather than by filling it in. Where the data behind a field matters more than the form, the discipline carries over into the register it feeds, with the same argument about free text against a short list of values.
More than you can justify individually. The test is whether you would hold up the whole submission for that one answer; if not, it is optional.
No. It is useful and widely falsified when mandatory, which turns a genuine signal into noise that looks like data.
Require them, and say why on the form. People answer compliance questions honestly far more often when the reason is stated than when the field simply refuses to let them continue.
Employee referrals hire faster and cheaper than any advert. How to run a scheme, what to pay and when, and the homogeneity problem that comes with it.
Screening decides who gets a conversation. How to set criteria before reading applications, what to screen on by phone, and the shortcuts that quietly become discrimination.
Conversion tracking records when a visitor does what the page existed for. Which events to define, why platform numbers disagree, and the double-counting nobody checks.