I-9 acceptable documents: the list, and the mistake of asking for more
The employee chooses which documents to show. An employer trying to be thorough by asking for a specific one commits a separate violation from the one they were avoiding.
Paying a foreign contractor without a W-8BEN on file means withholding 30% — or paying it yourself later, which is how most businesses discover the rule.
The W-8BEN is the certificate a foreign individual gives a United States payer to establish that they are not a US person, and to claim a reduced rate of withholding under a tax treaty where one applies. Its counterpart for entities is the W-8BEN-E, which is substantially longer and asks about the entity’s status under international reporting rules.
It matters because the default is unfavourable. Payments of certain US-source income to foreign persons are subject to withholding at a statutory rate unless a valid certificate supports a lower one — and the obligation falls on the payer. A business that pays a foreign contractor in full without the form has usually not avoided the withholding; it has become liable for it.
Withholding applies to US-source income. Where a foreign contractor performs services entirely outside the United States, the income is generally foreign-source and outside the withholding regime — a distinction that trips up businesses in both directions, some withholding when they need not and others assuming no obligation because the person lives abroad. The location of the work, not the location of the payer or the bank, is the determining factor, and it is worth establishing per engagement rather than per vendor.
A W-8BEN generally remains valid until the end of the third calendar year following the year it was signed, and it becomes invalid earlier if the circumstances it certifies change. Diarise the expiry with the vendor record — an expired certificate is treated as no certificate at all.
A foreign individual signs a W-8BEN. A foreign company signs a W-8BEN-E, and that form requires the entity to state its chapter four status under the international reporting regime, which is where most of its length comes from. Sending an individual’s form to a company or vice versa produces an invalid certificate, and an invalid certificate has the same effect as none. Where the entity’s status is genuinely unclear — an intermediary, a partnership, a hybrid — the answer is worth taking advice on once rather than guessing every year.
Treat it exactly like the domestic equivalent, as a step in supplier onboarding: no form, no first payment. Ettex Records holds the certificates per vendor with the expiry date visible so a lapse is caught before a payment rather than after, Ettex Sheets tracks which foreign vendors are approaching expiry, and the domestic counterpart is covered in w 9 form.
To be clear: none of this is tax advice, and cross-border withholding is an area where the cost of a wrong assumption falls on the payer. Rates, treaty eligibility and the sourcing of service income are questions for a tax adviser and the current IRS instructions.
A certificate from a foreign individual establishing that they are not a US person and claiming any treaty-based reduction in withholding on US-source income.
The W-8BEN is for foreign individuals; the W-8BEN-E is for foreign entities and additionally requires the entity’s status under international reporting rules.
Generally until the end of the third calendar year after signing, and it lapses earlier if the certified circumstances change.
Withholding applies to US-source income, and services performed entirely abroad are generally foreign-source. Establish the position per engagement and take advice where it is unclear.
The employee chooses which documents to show. An employer trying to be thorough by asking for a specific one commits a separate violation from the one they were avoiding.
Being named as an additional insured is not the same as being mentioned on a certificate — and the version of the endorsement decides whether the cover survives the job finishing.
Electronic visit verification proves a home care visit happened. It does not prove the care was any good — and confusing the two is how agencies build the wrong process around it.