← All postsHow-to

Discount approval: deciding who may give away margin

A discount approval process decides who can reduce price and by how much. How to set thresholds, what to require as justification, and why most discounting is a process failure.

How-toD

Every discount is a transfer from margin to the customer, and unlike most spending it happens without a purchase order, a budget line or anybody noticing until the quarter ends. A discount approval process is simply the recognition that giving away five per cent of a price is a financial decision of the same kind as spending five per cent of a budget.

What a discount approval process defines

  • Thresholds: what each role may approve without escalation, stated as a percentage and as cash, since a small percentage on a large deal is a large amount.
  • Who approves above each threshold, and what happens when they are unavailable — an unavailable approver is the commonest cause of an unapproved discount.
  • What justification is required, which should be a reason rather than a rate.
  • Whether the discount is one-off or sets a price for renewal, which is the distinction most often left ambiguous and most expensive later.
  • Whether non-price concessions — extended terms, extra scope, free onboarding — go through the same gate, since they cost real money and usually do not.

Why most discounting is a process failure

Discounts cluster at the end of reporting periods, which tells you they are driven by internal timing rather than by customer value. They also cluster around deals that were qualified poorly or started late, where price becomes the only remaining lever because there is no time left for anything else. Treating discounting as a discipline problem misses this: the fix is usually earlier qualification and a realistic pipeline, not a stricter approval form. The approval process exists to make the pattern visible, and the pattern is the actual finding.

Record the reason as given, in the salesperson's words, not as a category from a dropdown. «Competitor matched our price» and «we were three weeks late with the proposal» both get filed as «competitive pressure» and mean completely different things about what to fix.

Keeping it workable

  1. Set thresholds that let most deals through without escalation, or the process becomes something people route around.
  2. Give approvals a turnaround time, since a gate that takes two days costs deals and teaches people to pre-emptively discount within their own limit.
  3. Review approved discounts monthly as a group rather than individually, because the distribution is what carries the information.
  4. Watch for repeat discounting to the same customer, which is a price change nobody decided to make.
  5. Publish what was approved, at least internally, so the standard is visible rather than negotiated privately each time.

Ettex Invoices carries the agreed price onto the invoice with the discount visible as a line rather than buried in a lower unit price, which is what makes the annual pattern countable. Where discounts are being traded for payment timing, the real cost shows up in the ageing rather than in the margin on that deal.

Frequently asked

Who should approve discounts?

Defined by threshold in both percentage and cash terms, with a named deputy — an unavailable approver is the commonest cause of discounts granted without approval.

Why do discounts cluster at quarter end?

Because they are driven by internal timing rather than customer value, which is a pipeline problem rather than a discipline problem.

Should non-price concessions need approval?

Yes. Extended terms, extra scope and free onboarding cost real money and usually bypass the gate entirely.

MI
Written by Maria I.

Part of the Ettex team — writing about product, engineering and the future of work.

More posts
Get the best of the Ettex blogProduct news, guides and tips — straight to your inbox, no spam.