Internal controls: the ones that work are the ones that leave evidence
A control that happens but leaves no trace cannot be relied on by anyone outside the room. Designing for evidence is what separates a control from a habit.
A dormant company trades not at all and files anyway. What makes it dormant is narrower than most owners assume, and one wrong transaction ends it.
A dormant company is one that has had no significant accounting transactions during a financial year. It still exists, it still has directors, and it still has filing obligations — dormant company accounts delivered to the registrar and, in most cases, a confirmation statement. Dormancy reduces what has to be filed; it does not switch the obligations off.
The definition is narrower than owners expect. A single bank charge, a payment for accountancy fees from the company account, or interest received can be a significant transaction and end dormancy for that year. Certain permitted items — shares taken by subscribers, some filing fees and penalties — are specifically excluded, which is precisely why everything else counts.
The mismatch between the two definitions of dormancy — the registrar’s and the tax authority’s — is the trap. A company can be dormant for filing purposes while still needing to deal with the tax authority, or be told by the tax authority that no return is required while the registrar still expects accounts.
Dormant is not the same as non-trading. A company can be non-trading — no sales — and still have transactions such as bank interest or costs, which makes it non-dormant and pushes it back into full accounts. Check the definition against the actual bank statement, not against the intention.
Usually to hold a name, protect a brand, park an entity between projects, or preserve a company with history for future use. Each is legitimate, and each costs a little admin per year. Where nobody can articulate the reason, the annual filings are a subscription to nothing, and striking the company off is the cheaper answer.
Because dormancy is a factual question answered from the accounting records, the records still have to exist even when there is almost nothing in them. Ettex Books keeps the year with its handful of entries and the filing dates against it, so the annual question — was anything significant transacted this year — is answered from the ledger rather than from memory. Whether a particular transaction is significant is an accounting judgement, and worth asking an accountant about rather than assuming.
Yes. Dormant companies file dormant accounts with the registrar. The form is much simpler than full accounts, but the obligation and the deadline remain.
Generally yes — it is a transaction that would normally be entered in the accounting records. Only specifically permitted items are ignored, and professional fees are usually not among them.
It can, but any charge, interest or fee on that account is a transaction. Many owners close the account precisely to avoid accidental transactions.
The same late filing penalties apply as for any accounts. Dormancy reduces the content, not the deadline.
A control that happens but leaves no trace cannot be relied on by anyone outside the room. Designing for evidence is what separates a control from a habit.
A statement of account shows the whole relationship, not one invoice. Sent on a schedule, it resolves most payment queries before anyone has to make a call.
A payment without a remittance advice leaves the supplier guessing which invoices it covers. That guess becomes your chase email three weeks later.