Standby letter of credit: the SBLC is a guarantee, not a payment method
A standby letter of credit is drawn only when something has gone wrong. That single difference changes how it is drafted, priced and diarised.
Incoterms allocate cost, risk and customs duties between buyer and seller. Choosing one by habit is how companies end up insuring cargo they do not own.
Incoterms are the standard trade terms published by the International Chamber of Commerce that say, in three letters plus a named place, who arranges transport, who bears the cost, where risk passes from seller to buyer, and who clears the goods through customs. They are written into the sales contract, and they are the shortest expensive sentence in it.
What they do not do is transfer ownership. Title passes according to the contract and the applicable law; an incoterm allocates cost and risk only. Contracts that rely on the incoterm to say who owns the goods are silent on the point they most needed to cover.
The split between cost and risk is where most disputes start. Under the C-terms the seller pays freight to the destination but risk has already passed at shipment — so goods damaged mid-voyage are the buyer’s loss even though the seller booked and paid for the vessel.
Two terms deserve particular caution. EXW puts export clearance on a buyer who may not be established in the exporting country; FCA is usually the better choice. DDP puts import clearance and duty on a seller who may not be registered for tax in the destination country, which can make it impossible to perform as written.
An incoterm without a named place is incomplete. "CIF" means nothing on its own; "CIF Rotterdam, Incoterms 2020" means something specific. Always state the rule, the place, and the version — the 2010 and 2020 editions differ, and both remain in use because contracts choose them explicitly.
These are five places one decision has to be reproduced without drifting, and drift is exactly what happens when the term lives in a template that has been copied for years. Keeping the trading terms in a maintained contract document rather than in a habit is the cheap fix; Ettex Docs holds the clause and its history, so a change agreed with a customer reaches the contract instead of only the shipping desk.
Most companies use the incoterm they have always used. The questions worth asking annually: can we actually clear export or import where the term requires it; are we insuring cargo whose risk has already passed to someone else; and is freight being priced into our margin under a C-term without anyone reviewing it. Each has a straightforward answer and a recurring cost when it goes unasked.
The one the contract names. Incoterms 2020 is current, but 2010 remains valid where the parties choose it. If no version is stated, the argument is about which was intended — so state it.
No. It allocates cost, risk and obligations. Title passes under the contract and the governing law, which is why supply contracts include a separate retention of title clause.
Both deliver to the named destination. Under DAP the buyer clears the goods for import and pays duty; under DDP the seller does. DDP requires the seller to be able to act as importer in that country.
FCA at a named place in the seller’s country is usually the balanced choice: the seller handles export clearance it is able to complete, and risk passes at a defined point rather than at a warehouse door.
A standby letter of credit is drawn only when something has gone wrong. That single difference changes how it is drafted, priced and diarised.
A loan note is issued under an instrument, held by noteholders and recorded in a register. Treating it as a longer promissory note is where the problems start.
Freezing changes moves risk rather than removing it. Everything queued during the freeze ships together afterwards, which is the riskiest release of the year.