UTM parameters: labelling links so the numbers add up
UTM parameters tell your analytics where a visitor came from. The five fields, a naming convention that survives contact with colleagues, and the mistakes that split one campaign into nine.
Most intranet projects fail on maintenance, not on features. Deciding who owns each page before launch matters more than which platform you pick.
An intranet is the internal site where a company keeps the things everyone needs and nobody should have to ask for: policies, forms, who does what, how to book leave, where the brand assets are, what happened this month. It is judged by one question — when someone needs an answer, do they go there first, or do they message a colleague.
That question is answered by maintenance rather than by features. An intranet with an out-of-date holiday policy and a staff list containing two people who left is not a slightly stale intranet; it is a site nobody trusts, and trust is the whole product.
What does not belong: anything that duplicates a system of record. An intranet page listing project statuses will drift from the project tool within a fortnight. Link to the source instead — the intranet is an index, not a copy.
The most common intranet failure is publishing everything at launch and reviewing nothing afterwards. A site with thirty maintained pages beats one with three hundred where a third are wrong — and the second kind teaches people to ask a colleague instead, permanently. Pages that create obligations should go through the document approval workflow rather than being edited in place.
Large organisations buy intranet platforms with governance, workflow and integrations, and the cost is justified by scale. A company of twenty people needs a site, a directory, a document library and someone who owns it — and usually already has the last of those as a part-time role.
Ettex Sites builds that shape: an internal site with pages, ownership and review dates, next to the document library and the team directory. It is not an enterprise intranet platform and does not pretend to be — where the requirement is workflow-heavy governance across thousands of employees, that is a different category of product and worth paying for.
A shared drive stores files. An intranet organises answers: it tells people what exists, where it is, who owns it and whether it is current, usually linking to the drive rather than replacing it.
One named person overall, with each page owned by whoever owns the underlying subject. Intranets owned entirely by IT go stale because IT does not know when the policy changed.
Fewer repeat questions in chat, the search log getting shorter, and new joiners finding things without asking. Page views alone tell you very little.
It can be the platform for one. The difference is editorial: an intranet has owners and review dates; a wiki without them becomes a large collection of half-true pages.
UTM parameters tell your analytics where a visitor came from. The five fields, a naming convention that survives contact with colleagues, and the mistakes that split one campaign into nine.
A cookie policy lists what you set, why, and how long it lasts. What has to be in it, why the banner is the real compliance question, and the common mistakes.
A modern slavery statement is public, annual and signed by the board. What has to be in it, where it goes, and the sentences that make it worse than saying nothing.